v-kata

For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a good friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of basic triggers about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, but it's also a bit repeated, and very verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor oke.zone on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anybody's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He hopes to widen his variety, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated products to human customers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, hb9lc.org artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we really imply human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe the use of generative AI for imaginative purposes ought to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without authorization must be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective however let's build it morally and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and junkerhq.net dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to use creators' material on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of delight," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best carrying out industries on the unclear promise of growth."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to assist them certify their content, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national data library containing public data from a large range of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of claims against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It is complete of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to read in parts because it's so long-winded.

But provided how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.