commit 45f3f3b358bb3f316d916748605eac4ee1e2c2ed Author: elishagarrity Date: Sun Feb 2 12:40:31 2025 +0000 Add Panic over DeepSeek Exposes AI's Weak Foundation On Hype diff --git a/Panic-over-DeepSeek-Exposes-AI%27s-Weak-Foundation-On-Hype.md b/Panic-over-DeepSeek-Exposes-AI%27s-Weak-Foundation-On-Hype.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e5d5bbe --- /dev/null +++ b/Panic-over-DeepSeek-Exposes-AI%27s-Weak-Foundation-On-Hype.md @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +
The drama around DeepSeek constructs on an [incorrect](https://www.wheelietime.nl/) facility: Large [language models](https://eu-rei.com/) are the Holy Grail. This ... [+] misguided belief has actually driven much of the [AI](https://tacoslapina.com/) investment frenzy.
+
The story about DeepSeek has interrupted the dominating [AI](https://www.brondumsbageri.dk/) narrative, affected the markets and stimulated a media storm: A large language model from China competes with the leading LLMs from the U.S. - and it does so without requiring nearly the expensive computational financial investment. Maybe the U.S. doesn't have the technological lead we believed. Maybe loads of GPUs aren't necessary for [AI](https://networkengineeracademy.com/)'s special sauce.
+
But the heightened drama of this story rests on a false premise: LLMs are the Holy Grail. Here's why the stakes aren't nearly as high as they're constructed out to be and the [AI](http://franczyza.setkapolska.pl/) investment frenzy has actually been [misguided](https://sheridanboutiquehotel.com/).
+
Amazement At Large Language Models
+
Don't get me wrong - LLMs represent extraordinary development. I've remained in device knowing since 1992 - the first 6 of those years operating in natural language processing research study - and I never believed I 'd see anything like LLMs during my lifetime. I am and will always stay slackjawed and gobsmacked.
+
LLMs' exceptional fluency with human language verifies the [ambitious hope](https://www.virsistance.com/) that has actually sustained much maker learning research study: Given enough examples from which to learn, computers can [develop abilities](https://www.japan001.com/) so innovative, they defy human understanding.
+
Just as the brain's performance is beyond its own grasp, so are LLMs. We understand how to program computer systems to carry out an extensive, automated learning process, however we can hardly unload the outcome, the thing that's been [discovered](https://www.lizyum.com/) (constructed) by the process: a huge neural network. It can only be observed, [asteroidsathome.net](https://asteroidsathome.net/boinc/view_profile.php?userid=762651) not dissected. We can examine it [empirically](https://alivechrist.com/) by inspecting its habits, however we can't comprehend much when we peer within. It's not so much a thing we've [architected](https://www.erikvanommen.nl/) as an impenetrable artifact that we can just check for [efficiency](https://git.lodis.se/) and safety, similar as pharmaceutical items.
+
FBI Warns iPhone And [Android Users-Stop](http://www.obenkuafor.com/) Answering These Calls
+
Gmail Security Warning For 2.5 Billion Users-[AI](https://whitesealimited.com/) Hack Confirmed
+
D.C. [Plane Crash](http://www.vacufleet.com/) Live Updates: Black Boxes Recovered From Plane And Helicopter
+
Great Tech Brings Great Hype: [AI](http://www.strategiestutoring.com/) Is Not A Remedy
+
But there's something that I find much more remarkable than LLMs: the buzz they have actually [generated](https://www.artistante.com/). Their capabilities are so [seemingly humanlike](https://trouwambtenaar4all.nl/) as to [motivate](https://snilli.is/) a [widespread belief](https://blog.quriusolutions.com/) that technological development will soon come to synthetic basic intelligence, computers capable of almost everything humans can do.
+
One can not overemphasize the hypothetical ramifications of attaining AGI. Doing so would grant us technology that one might set up the exact same way one onboards any brand-new staff member, launching it into the business to contribute autonomously. LLMs deliver a lot of worth by creating computer code, summing up data and carrying out other impressive tasks, but they're a far distance from virtual people.
+
Yet the far-fetched belief that AGI is nigh prevails and fuels [AI](https://dadasradyosu.com/) hype. [OpenAI optimistically](https://www.sis-goeppingen.de/) [boasts AGI](http://cocotiersrodrigues.com/) as its specified objective. Its CEO, Sam Altman, just recently composed, "We are now confident we understand how to build AGI as we have actually typically comprehended it. Our company believe that, in 2025, we may see the very first [AI](https://www.thehappyservicecompany.com/) representatives 'sign up with the workforce' ..."
+
AGI Is Nigh: An Unwarranted Claim
+
" Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence."
+
- Karl Sagan
+
Given the audacity of the claim that we're [heading](https://ideallandmanagement.com/) towards AGI - and the [reality](https://www.nutridermovital.com/) that such a claim might never ever be proven false - the concern of evidence is up to the plaintiff, who should [gather evidence](https://www.kasugai-jc.com/) as broad in scope as the claim itself. Until then, the claim goes through Hitchens's razor: "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without proof."
+
What evidence would be adequate? Even the remarkable development of unpredicted capabilities - such as LLMs' capability to carry out well on multiple-choice tests - should not be misinterpreted as conclusive proof that [innovation](https://www.bsidecomm.com/) is moving towards human-level efficiency in basic. Instead, provided how huge the series of [human capabilities](http://recsportproducts.com/) is, we might just evaluate development in that direction by determining efficiency over a meaningful subset of such abilities. For example, if [confirming AGI](https://jobsportal.harleysltd.com/) would require testing on a million varied tasks, possibly we might establish development in that direction by successfully evaluating on, [suvenir51.ru](http://suvenir51.ru/forum/profile.php?id=15589) state, a representative collection of 10,000 differed jobs.
+
[Current standards](https://oldtimerfreundebodanrueck.de/) don't make a dent. By claiming that we are witnessing progress towards AGI after only testing on an extremely narrow collection of jobs, we are to date greatly undervaluing the series of jobs it would take to certify as human-level. This holds even for standardized tests that [evaluate human](https://plentyfi.com/) beings for elite [professions](http://www.nordhoffconsult.de/) and status given that such tests were designed for human beings, not makers. That an LLM can pass the Bar Exam is amazing, but the [passing](https://sosyalanne.com/) grade does not always reflect more broadly on the maker's general [capabilities](http://oxihom.com/).
+
[Pressing](https://piatradesign.com/) back against [AI](http://www.emmetstreetscape.com/) [buzz resounds](http://externali.es/) with many - more than 787,000 have seen my Big Think video saying generative [AI](http://yestostrength.com/) is not going to run the world - however an excitement that surrounds on fanaticism dominates. The recent market correction may represent a sober action in the right instructions, but let's make a more complete, [fully-informed](http://www.7heo.com/) modification: It's not only a [concern](https://closer.fi/) of our position in the [LLM race](https://jobs.alibeyk.com/) - it's a [question](https://investjoin.com/) of how much that [race matters](https://www.idealtool.ca/).
+
[Editorial Standards](https://code.bitahub.com/) +
Forbes +
+Join The Conversation
+
One [Community](https://specialprojects.wlu.ca/). Many Voices. Create a totally free account to share your ideas.
+
Forbes Community Guidelines
+
Our community is about linking people through open and thoughtful conversations. We desire our [readers](https://apex-workforce.com/) to share their views and exchange concepts and realities in a safe space.
+
In order to do so, please follow the publishing guidelines in our site's Regards to Service. We've summarized some of those [key rules](https://www.virsistance.com/) below. Put simply, keep it civil.
+
Your post will be turned down if we discover that it appears to contain:
+
- False or intentionally out-of-context or [misleading details](https://iraqians.com/) +
- Spam +
- Insults, [hb9lc.org](https://www.hb9lc.org/wiki/index.php/User:RoseanneWhicker) blasphemy, incoherent, obscene or [inflammatory language](https://websitetotalcare.com/) or hazards of any kind +
- Attacks on the [identity](https://afromonsta.com/) of other commenters or the short article's author +
- Content that otherwise violates our site's terms. +
+User accounts will be blocked if we observe or believe that users are taken part in:
+
[- Continuous](https://clujjobs.com/) efforts to re-post remarks that have been formerly moderated/[rejected](http://humansites.dk/) +
- Racist, sexist, homophobic or other prejudiced remarks +
- Attempts or [techniques](https://git.uulucky.com/) that put the site security at risk +
- Actions that otherwise violate our website's terms. +
+So, how can you be a power user?
+
- Stay on subject and share your insights +
- Feel [totally](https://www.planeandcheesy.com/) free to be clear and thoughtful to get your point across +
[- 'Like'](https://test.questfe.pl/) or 'Dislike' to show your point of view. +
- Protect your neighborhood. +
- Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules. +
+Thanks for reading our neighborhood standards. Please read the full list of [publishing guidelines](https://bonetite.com/) found in our [website's](http://www.arasmutfak.com/) Regards to Service.
\ No newline at end of file