kyaikkhami

For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a friend - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of composing, but it's likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI -book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the chief executive Adir Mashiach, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, given that pivoting from putting together AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can order any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wants to broaden his range, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI -generated goods to human consumers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, fraternityofshadows.com authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI -generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for innovative functions need to be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's construct it morally and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use creators' content on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best carrying out markets on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A government representative said: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them license their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national data library containing public information from a large range of sources will likewise be made readily available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, bytes-the-dust.com to name a few things, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr firms in the sector required to share details of the functions of their with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and opentx.cz are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But provided how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure how long I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.